Estym8 DocsEstym8 Home

Pitch deck — Estym8

Product context: Estym8 is built from scratch as an AI-first construction preconstruction platform—not a legacy takeoff stack with AI bolted on. AI runs across the product: bid-package ingestion and classification, multi-model takeoff and vision, plan intelligence, cross-file synthesis, Estee, estimate-to-submittal draft review, and optimization recommendations. Canonical framing: AI-first positioning.

Confidential — for discussion only · Not an offer to sell securities.

Canonical deck: this file → estym8.ai/docs/pitch-deck. For a meeting handout, open that URL in Chrome/Safari → Print → Save as PDF (enable “Background graphics”).


Estym8

Bid-ready takeoffs & plan intelligence from full plan sets and bid-package folders

Multi-trade · USA · subscription SaaS · estym8.ai · May 2026


Deal & financials at a glance

For the finance-first reader — the business case up front; product detail follows.

The ask

Seed round — targeting ~$2–3M (anchor ~$2.5M; open to ~$5M for the right lead)

Instrument

  • Seed equity (priced round or SAFE) — funds a real team and 18–24 months of runway.
  • Valuation, rights, and structure set with the committed lead and counsel (not pre-set here).
  • Founder owns 100% today and retains majority post-round; company has no debt.

What this round funds

  • A hands-on engineering leader (CTO), operations (COO), and early engineering / GTM hires.
  • AI compute & calibration, paid-acquisition validation, and runway to meaningful MRR.
  • A market-credible founder salary (not a majority of the raise) and key-person insurance payable to investors.

Reporting

  • Monthly MRR, paying seats, churn, plus standard investor information and pro-rata rights.

Stage (honest)

  • Pre-revenue / closed beta.
  • v1 in production; Stripe per-seat billing + plan gating shipped; founder-led beta on real bid folders.
  • Design-partner engagements in progress, including a commercial electrical-contractor beta — validated against multiple real bid folders.

Use of funds (~$2.5M · ≈ 18–24 months)

  • Team (founder market salary + CTO + COO + early hires) — ~56%
  • Marketing / GTM — ~12%
  • AI compute (prod + calibration) — ~8%
  • Product / infra — ~6%
  • Reserve / contingency — ~11%
  • Legal + accounting, key-person insurance, events, cost data — remainder

Illustrative projections (modeled; validated with measured cohorts post-raise):

Month 6Month 12Month 18Month 24
Paying seats~30~100~185~300
MRR~$5.1K~$17K~$31K~$51K

Deeper diligence: team, org/scaling plan, cap-table and round detail, churn/payback tables, and unit economics in the investor fundraise brief (shared under NDA); market sizing + sensitivity in the valuation framework.


The problem

  • Commercial preconstruction = manual counting, retyped notes, and plan QA across dozens of files per pursuit.
  • Bid deadlines and loaded labor ($50–80+/hr) mean missed bids and thin margin when counts or RFIs are wrong.
  • Whole bid folders are normal; most tools still behave like one PDF, one trade.

Who we serve

  • Estimators & preconstruction leads on subcontractor and GC teams — commercial, institutional, multi-family (USA first).
  • Subs bidding to GCs and GC in-house estimators pricing from design-team plan sets (architect + engineering firms) — self-perform, owner bids, buy-out, and sub validation.
  • Multi-trade pursuits on one product spine; deepest calibration MEP-forward today, expanding vertical depth on customer sets.
  • Not small one-off residential remodel as primary ICP.

What Estym8 delivers

You bringYou get
One PDF or entire bid folderClassified files, run plan, completed estimates
Drawing PDFsCounts, materials, raceway/wire, concerns, draft RFIs
Full packageVerbatim sheet harvest, code-edition alerts, cross-file intelligence, narrative report
Priced estimateExport + GC read-only link; submittal path (evolving)

One product for single-sheet and folder uploads — not two SKUs.


Product flow

  1. Project → upload PDF or folder (plans & docs)
  2. Analyze → plan → execute (discipline bundles where needed)
  3. Review harvest, conflicts, RFIs, cross-file findings, narrative report
  4. Export PDF / Excel / CSV · Estee run-grounded Q&A

Typical run: tens of minutes for substantial sets (varies by size & job count).


Why we win

  • Whole bid package — not a single-discipline point tool
  • Traceability — claims tied to what’s printed on the sheets
  • Cross-file intelligence after folder completion — coordination & RFI seeds
  • Bid-bucket reconciliation vs schedule/printed totals where supported
  • Speed — days of manual work → same-day iteration
  • Continuous QC — ground-truth library, user feedback, regression as models change

We are not underpricing vs value — below legacy enterprise, above simple counters.


Honest scope (trust)

  • Richest automation today: MEP-forward calibration & ground-truth regression
  • Other trades share the same folder pipeline; depth follows roadmap & customer sets
  • Submittal / spec AI: review assist — not compliance sign-off
  • RFI drafts: user sends through their project process; Estym8 does not track architect responses today

Competitive context (pricing)

AlternativeTypical costEstym8
In-house labor$320–2,800+ / plan setFraction of labor; hours → minutes
Outsourced takeoff$150–400+ / projectSubscription; in-house control
PlanSwift / Countfire~$99–167 / moPremium vs point tools; folder-native
Trimble-class enterprise$1,000s+/seat10×+ lower entry; AI-native workflow

Business model & pricing (seat-based)

  • B2B subscription (Stripe) · per seat · USA
  • Meter completed estimate runs / month (single PDF = 1 run; multi-discipline folder = multiple runs)
  • Annual billing: 15% discount · Overage: $35 / additional completed run
TierSeatsMonthlyRuns / mo
Solo1$1798–10
Studio2–5$149/seat (from $298/mo)12/seat pooled
Firm6–15$129/seat15/seat pooled
Enterprise16+CustomSLA + onboarding

ROI anchor: one saved estimator day ≈ $320–500one bid pays for the month.


Unit economics (planning)

MetricTarget
ARPS (avg revenue/seat)~$165–175 blended (Y1)
CAC<$900 (paid + content + demo)
Payback< 8 months
Gross marginTrack AI COGS per run; improve with scale & caching

ARPA = revenue per account; ARPS = revenue per seat.


Go-to-market (USA)

Primary growth lever post-raise: paid acquisitionuntested at scale today; budget and funnel modeled below, then validated with $5–10K initial tests before full ramp.

  • Paid social & search — Meta, Google, LinkedIn (~$75→$200/day over 6–9 months; ~$70K from raise)
  • Live demo for qualified leads (Calendly) — convert ad traffic that needs trust on bid folders
  • Communities & content — r/estimators, LinkedIn precon (supporting, not primary volume)
  • Lead magnets — bid-folder QA checklist, RFI-from-plans guides
  • Associations & events — NECA, MCAA, SMACNA, AGC (as budget allows)

Ads are acquisition spend, not product revenue. Subscriptions + overage runs are the revenue model.


Conversion model (Year 1 — conservative, illustrative)

Assumes paid traffic at scale — rates are planning assumptions until first ad cohorts run.

Per ~1,000 site visits / month:

StageRateResult
→ Sign up6%60
→ Verified55%33
→ Demo / call30%10
Paid (30d)~25% of trial path~2 new accounts/mo

At 2K visits/mo~4–6 new accounts/mo → path to 80–120 seats @ month 12 with ~$70K ad spend in use-of-funds.


Growth plan (illustrative)

Blended ~$170/seat/mo · churn modeled 5% → 3% over 3 years

MonthPaying seatsMRR
630~$5K
12100~$17K
18185~$31K
24300~$51K

Replace with actuals as traction arrives.


Traction

  • Stage: v1 in production; pre-revenue / closed beta — Stripe per-seat billing and plan gating shipped
  • Product: Bid-package folder pipeline live (classify → AI project overview → run plan → multi-discipline execute); single-PDF path; exports; GC read-only view; estimate-to-submittal GA-track
  • Calibration: Ground-truth plan-set regression library; Jonas GC commercial bid folders in automated compare pipeline
  • Go-to-market: Design-partner engagements in progress (incl. a commercial electrical-contractor beta) on real pursuit folders; paid acquisition planned post-raise

Roadmap (financing enables)

  • Trade vertical depth on the shipped folder spine (concrete, structural, utilities, cross-discipline consistency)
  • Licensed cost data (RSMeans-class) post-rights
  • Submittal workflow depth (catalog, compliance exports, spec review)
  • Self-serve checkout & team admin at scale

No fixed public dates — phased delivery driven by customer sets and regression quality.


Milestones this financing enables

  1. Month 6: 30+ paying seats · self-serve checkout live · demo funnel + walkthrough video shipped
  2. Month 12: 100+ seats · ~$17K MRR · RSMeans integrated · trade depth v1
  3. Month 18: 185+ seats · ~$31K MRR · annual contracts 35%+ of base

Bodi (portfolio — not in this raise)

  • Bodi = ICT / low-voltage Basis of Design from sources → claims
  • Same founder, 100% ownedseparate from Estym8 and not part of this raise
  • Natural integration path: Estym8 plan intelligence → Bodi claims (roadmap)

Ownership & structure

  • Estym8 equity100% founder-owned today; founder retains majority after a seed round.
  • Estym8 debtNone.
  • InstrumentSeed equity (priced round or SAFE). Round size, valuation, option pool, and investor rights set with the committed lead and counsel (not pre-set here).
  • Team — operating team (CTO, COO) + advisory board forming; key-person insurance payable to investors planned.
  • Reporting — Monthly MRR, seats, churn; standard information and pro-rata rights.

The ask — seed round (~$2–3M, anchor ~$2.5M)

Funds the team + runway to scale; founder retains majority.

Use of funds (~$2.5M · ≈ 18–24 months):

  • Team — founder market salary + CTO + COO + early eng/GTM hires — ~56%
  • Marketing / GTM (+ product walkthrough video) — ~12%
  • AI compute & calibration — ~8%
  • Product & infra — ~6%
  • Reserve / contingency — ~11%
  • Legal & accounting, key-person insurance, events, RSMeans / data — remainder

Estym8 has no corporate debt. Founder salary is a market-credible figure — not a majority of the raise.


Investor return & upside (equity)

  • Equity upside in an AI-native preconstruction platform serving a large, labor-constrained market.
  • Return via future priced rounds, secondary, or acquisition — construction-tech strategics value bundled precon + ICT (Estym8 + Bodi optionality).
  • Pro-rata rights to maintain ownership in later rounds.
  • A non-dilutive revenue-share structure remains available for an angel who prefers it — discussed privately, not the primary ask.

Team

Shannon Horn — Founder & CEO

  • 20+ years as designer, developer, and founder — AI-native products from UX through production code
  • Founder: Estym8 (commercial plan-set preconstruction), Bodi (ICT project brain), MEOS (massage-school OS)
  • Portfolio & background: shannonahorn.com
  • Contact: shannon@estym8.ai

Operating team & advisory board (forming, June 2026): a hands-on engineering leader (CTO), operations/COO, and senior technology and construction-domain advisors — names and bios available under NDA in the data room. A key-person insurance policy (payable to investors) is planned.

Hiring post-raise: engineering, GTM, and customer success tied to MRR milestones.


Materials for diligence & next meeting

  • This deck (PDF) — Print estym8.ai/docs/pitch-deck → Save as PDF, or share the live URL
  • 60–90s product walkthrough videoIn production — funded in marketing line item; available on request / with second meeting
  • Live demo — Calendly / screen-share on a real bid folder
  • Written diligenceInvestor overview · Valuation · Competitors · Folder workflow · Pricing
  • Definitive seed financing docs (SAFE or priced equity) — Counsel to draft after term alignment — legal budgeted in use of funds

Legal

This deck is for discussion only. Forward-looking statements are plans, not guarantees. Market, conversion, and return illustrations are hypothetical. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not an offer to sell securities — consult qualified counsel before any transaction.

Estym8 has no corporate debt. Founder personal obligations disclosed in use-of-funds narrative only.

Questions: Shannon Horn · shannon@estym8.ai · shannonahorn.com