ResourcesBid-week RFI triage

Estym8

Bid-week RFI triage

When to send an RFI vs qualify the bid vs carry documented risk.

Opens your browser's print dialog — choose "Save as PDF" to download.

Suggested PDF filename: estym8-rfi-triage-one-pager.pdf

How to read this sheet

Use bid-week side-by-side with your checklist. Goal: classify each gap quickly — RFI now, qualify or assume in the proposal, or carry explicit risk — instead of re-litigating omissions between reviewers.

Policy bullets

  1. RFI now when the omission changes scope, code, safety, labor access, allowances, warranty, or money beyond what you can reasonably bound with a stated assumption.
  2. Do not RFI trivia you resolve from another sheet, enlarged plan, or specification anchor — cite the governing reference in your exclusions or assumptions instead.
  3. When the GC will not respond in time, carry risk in writing: assumption, exclusion, allowance, or bid alternate with a clear reversal clause if assumptions are rejected.
  4. Schedule vs plan mismatch — align to the negotiated basis-of-design narrative; escalate if scopes truly diverge.
  5. Legend gaps / orphan symbols — RFI when counts swing dollars; otherwise exclude or annotate with an explicit zero-qty note position with rationale.
  6. Contradictory refs — one consolidated RFI listing both anchors and requesting the governing document.
  7. Deadline rule: if no answer arrives before bid time, move to exclusions plus allowances plus a written escalation path — assumptions must be deliberate, not accidental.

If / then shorthand

SituationDefault move
Unresolved detail changes scope or allowance basisQuantify allowance + escalate or RFI
Spec references incomplete equipment narrativeBaseline to schedule note + caveat
Two discipline notes contradictSingle RFI naming both locations
Incomplete legend on an active takeoff planeFreeze pattern + assumption or formal RFI if material

Drafting RFIs. Estym8 surfaces conflicts and drafts candidate RFI wording — you review and decide what ships. Multi-discipline narrative report—download a single Markdown / DOCX / PDF report that stitches the verbatim plan harvest, every completed takeoff, conflict log, draft RFIs, and bid-bucket reconciliation against engineer-printed totals (when fixture or equipment schedules are present) into one decision-ready package per project.

Estym8

Plan-set intelligence for MEP takeoffs — verbatim harvests, mismatches surfaced, drafts you can defend. Estimators stay in charge; software highlights where to look — it does not replace judgment.